Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
573-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

573-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971535 50.866790)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971478 50.866784,-0.971481 50.866795,-0.971488 50.866805,-0.971501 50.866813,-0.971516 50.866818,-0.971534 50.866820,-0.971552 50.866819,-0.971568 50.866814,-0.971580 50.866806,-0.971589 50.866796,-0.971592 50.866785,-0.971589 50.866774,-0.971581 50.866764,-0.971569 50.866756,-0.971553 50.866750,-0.971536 50.866748,-0.971518 50.866750,-0.971502 50.866755,-0.971489 50.866763,-0.971481 50.866773,-0.971478 50.866784)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL